If you work in construction, you’ve probably seen the phrase “or equivalent” in architectural and engineering specifications. It sounds simple — offering flexibility when selecting materials like handrails, balustrades, and access platforms. But what does equivalent really mean?
Does it mean an exact match in function, durability, and compliance? Or just something that looks similar on paper? The reality is, not all products are created equal, and the wrong substitution can lead to unexpected costs, compliance risks, and long-term performance issues.
When “Equivalent” is an Illusion
It’s a common misconception that all pre-engineered access systems are interchangeable. When a lower-cost alternative is used, it might appear identical at first glance — but hidden weaknesses can emerge over time including:
- Material failures – Inferior materials may corrode faster or lack the strength needed for long-term durability
- Hidden costs – A cheaper upfront price can lead to higher maintenance costs, repairs, or even full replacements
- Compliance risks – Not all substitutes meet strict building codes, putting safety and liability on the line
How Do You Determine True Equivalency?
Also known as “or approved substitution,” “or equal,” or “or comparable”, these provisions all imply the same thing: a different product may be used instead of the one specified. But determining what’s truly equivalent isn’t always straightforward.
Here’s what to ask when considering a substitution:
- Does it meet all the essential functions and performance standards?
- Are the materials, durability, and compliance at least equal to the specified product?
- Does it come with a comparable warranty and technical support?
- Is it designed for site-specific conditions like Moddex systems?
- Can it be delivered on time without causing project delays?
If the answer isn’t a clear yes to all, then it’s not a true equivalent.
The Hidden Costs of Cutting Corners and Going Cheaper
Construction projects are under constant pressure to reduce costs. While choosing a cheaper alternative might seem like a good idea upfront, it often comes at a price later:
- Premature failures – Harsh weather or heavy use can expose flaws in weaker materials
- Increased maintenance – More frequent repairs mean more costs and downtime
- Long-term liability – If a substituted product fails, asset owners bear the consequences
Think Long Term about Lifetime Cost of Ownership
The most cost-effective choice isn’t always the cheapest option today — it’s the one that performs over years, not just months.
- Durability matters – A well-engineered system ensures long-term functionality
- Compliance isn’t optional – Safety and regulatory standards exist for a reason
- Expert support makes a difference – Working with a trusted supplier means having guidance every step of the way
Getting it Right
The “or equivalent” provision may seem flexible, but it requires careful consideration. Rushing into substitutions without a thorough evaluation can compromise safety, increase costs, and impact long-term performance. For manufacturers like Moddex, our goal is to provide complete transparency, offering detailed specification sheets, technical resources, and project support to ensure you’re getting a system you can trust.
